Search for: "MATTER OF R L T" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Paramjit L. Mahli
“In today’s fast paced, 24/7 technological world, it doesn’t matter whether your law firm is in Albany, N.Y. or Lexington, Kan. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Kevin
Curtis Tax Updates Just in case you couldn't tell by the title, this blog is authored by attorneys at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Kevin
Curtis Tax Updates Just in case you couldn't tell by the title, this blog is authored by attorneys at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Benoît Battistelli (France) elected EPO President (EPLAW) (Innovation Partners) (IP Kat) (IAM) (IAM) (IP Watch) (IP:JUR) US Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O)   Global Global -… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Benoît Battistelli (France) elected EPO President (EPLAW) (Innovation Partners) (IP Kat) (IAM) (IAM) (IP Watch) (IP:JUR) US Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O)   Global Global -… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm by mjpetro
The government questioned whether this joint representation was permissible and asked the courtfor a hearing on the matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:35 am by Fernando M. Pinguelo
” But, before we solve the final puzzle (SAN_TIONS), here are the plaintiffs’ R-S-T-L-N and E (Reckless Steps Their Lawyers Negligently Endorsed):* The Plaintiffs Plaintiffs did not issue an appropriate written litigation hold until a few years after they should have. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
But, again, you can’t make people watch, listen, or read if they don’t want to. [read post]