Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Reynolds provided evidence of mark strength; similarity of the parties’ packages; similarity of goods, marketing channels, and advertising; and Handi-Foil’s specific intent to make the packages look similar. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
Here is the fourth in our weekly series of compilations by our good friend and former guest Kat Alberto who is currently endearing himself to all of us and incidentally making himself indispensable by summarising the feature posts (excluding the regular around-ups) that appeared on this weblog over the previous week. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:06 am
Of course, there is a goods/place association between the mark and the goods because, as readily established by Examining Attorney Susan C. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
Attorney Ronald C. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
(Exhibit C). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
–A person who in good faith accepts a power of attorney without actual knowledge that a signature or mark of any of the following are not genuine may, without liability, rely upon the genuineness of the signature or mark of: The principal A person who signed the power of attorney on behalf of the principal and at the direction of the principal A witness A notary public or other person authorized by law to take acknowledgments[2] By this amendment, a third party may… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
–A person who in good faith accepts a power of attorney without actual knowledge that a signature or mark of any of the following are not genuine may, without liability, rely upon the genuineness of the signature or mark of: The principal A person who signed the power of attorney on behalf of the principal and at the direction of the principal A witness A notary public or other person authorized by law to take acknowledgments[2] By this amendment, a third party may… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:10 pm
§1114 are limited to: (1) not less than $1,000 or more than $200,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods..., as the court considers just; or(2) if the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, not more than $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of good..., as the court considers just. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
To Primus, this case is not about making good business decisions, or about the facts and the law. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
One of the most unsettling question marks in a divorce case is the cost of attorney fees. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
One of the most unsettling question marks in a divorce case is the cost of attorney fees. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
To Primus, this case is not about making good business decisions, or about the facts and the law. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm
It can be argued that marks commonly used on the same type of goods are only entitled to a narrow scope of protection. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
The first is Case T-221/12, now renumbered as Case C-142/14 P, The Sunrider Corporation v OHIM. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
L. c. 265, § 43A, as interpreted by this Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
§ 1117(c);J. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
".Though it appears both logical and correct in law to conclude that the figurative mark can be registered while the word mark can't, the IPKat wonders what it will mean in practice if the figurative mark appears on goods but no use may be made of the word that appears so prominently within it. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
The Court ruled on the bitter-sweet issue of the genuine use of an earlier national trade mark for the purposes of proof of use within an opposition proceeding before the OHIM (Case C-141/13 P Reber Holding GmbH & Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
If, as the DSC reports, he admitted that the DSC "was within its legal rights to amend its articles of incorporation," then he contradicted his opinion of invalidity.]Martin C. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
The fact that no single agency received top marks across the board presumably reflects, to some degree, the difficulty in administering all the elements of what the Center would like to see in a government disclosure program. [read post]
