Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 12:05 pm
In this case (Estate of Presley v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:30 am
When presenting the court with the marriage equality cases, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
No. 3376197; it’s been on the books in the United States since January 2008, with a claimed priority date of March 8, 2006. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am
Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm
That rejection was correct under Montana election law, the majority held: There is one Section within [Montana election law]—the Montana Absent Uniformed Services and Overseas Voter Act—that expressly authorizes the use of "digital signatures" for active-duty United States military members and United States citizens residing outside the United States but eligible to vote. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
Like many such unfocused fusillades, though, she misses every mark. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently made a significant decision regarding the certification procedure for collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:59 pm
On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in SEC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:59 pm
On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in SEC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Toys "R" Us, Inc., has interpreted the first sale doctrine to cover both (1) copies manufactured aboard but first sold in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner's permission. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(2) Is the Presidency an "office ... under the United States? [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
The jury found Australian Leather and its owner Eddie Oygur willfully infringed the “UGG” mark when the Australian company sold 12 pairs of sheepskin boots brandishing the mark to customers in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
