Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 1:34 pm
This is Ontario, where matters fermented are ruled by a bureaucracy that is truly Soviet in size and style. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:18 pm
Section 274(m)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code strictly forbids deductions for bringing spouses and dependents along on business travel unless the spouses and dependents (a) are employees of the taxpayer (here, the taxpayer is the governor), (b) are travelling for a bona fide business purpose, and (c) would otherwise be entitled to deduct the travel on their own tax returns. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Grasso based on the March 2006 merger of the NYSE into a for-profit entity.(4) c. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:12 pm
The significance of the plagiarism during law school seems more problematic than the Kinnock-cribbing, b/c he used to credit Kinnock in previous iterations and probably innocently forgot to during the stump speech. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
I'm looking forward to being proven wrong, but I worry that if Biden's indicative of Obama's judgment on serious matters, the Dems need to worry more. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:53 pm
M & M Savant Limited v Brown and others LRX/26/2006 It is a shame that this case was decided in 2008, and not in 1998 when it would have had a much greater relevance. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Subsection (c) Reply Brief The proposed changes are stylistic. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 3:37 am
Todd Dickinson is not a registered patent attorney listed on the USPTO's roster [the only Dickinson's are David B., Jon M., and Kari A.] [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
I'm writing this post about the Business Court's past decisions involving tortious interference with contract because "tortious interference" is one of the most common searches leading readers to this blog. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis appeals her convictions and sentence for assisting a criminal in murder as a Class C felony and giving a false statement to law enforcement as a Class B misdemeanor. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:28 am
  Although I would need more facts to assess whether your former employer would be able to satisfy these requirements, I’m skeptical based even on the data you shared. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:32 pm
New subsection (b)(6): This section is lengthy, so I'm not going do retype it here. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Subsection (b) The list of appealable orders is too long to retype here. [read post]