Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
  As the New Jersey Supreme Court stated more than 25 years ago in Francis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:31 am
Aguirre, Jr., etc., et al., Unites States Circuit Court of Appeals; 3d Circuit, March 11, 2008 [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 5:58 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey, which involved a complaint against the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006:C. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:21 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court established new law regarding the confrontation clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 12:01 pm
On January 29, 2008 the New Jersey Appellate Division in State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
Here is a link to the 18-page opinion, New Jersey v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
These grants are integral to New Jersey's homeland security efforts and provided the state with $14 million last year alone. v Eliminates Key Funding for Police Officers. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Plaintiffs claimed violations of the "Public Use Clause" of the Fifth Amendment and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, along with a New York State law claim. [read post]