Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
See, e.g., Hyatt v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Sec. 33 tells us registration is prima facie evidence of exclusive right to use mark in connection w/goods. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
As the Court said in Johnson v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:12 pm
Policy, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:30 am
(Except that, as the ALJ’s findings indicate, these are functionally establishment claims whether they use the words “tests prove” or not, so one would think we ought to look upward and not downward for the standard ….) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
The Doyle estate tells us that “no workable standard exists to protect the Ten Stories’ incre-mental character development apart from protecting the completed characters. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
Mazars case or under some more deferential standard? [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
As the US Supreme Court has explained,‘The act of state doctrine does (…) have “constitutional” underpinnings. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Daum v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
” The case is Smallwood v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am
There's the right to counsel itself (Gideon v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s recognition in Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:39 am
Supreme Court case of Cavazos v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:23 am
In Pennbarr Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm
Censorship is used to masque criticism and divert attention on to more convenient truths. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
Bayer v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
At the same time, none of us think that this information should cause us to change the standard the President has articulated or the rhetoric he has used. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
Sweeney draws attention to Apple's behavior and double standards. [read post]
