Search for: "Paine v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 6,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Matthew Flinn
Nevertheless, on the present state of the law, the technique is legal. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:22 pm by The Grife Law Firm, P.A.
Last month, the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Florida clarified this issue in a written opinion in Domino’s Pizza v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 6:47 am by Robert L Abell
"No" answered the Kentucky Supreme Court addressing a question of first impression in its recent decision in Osborne v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
., of the York County Court of Common Pleas in the case of McWeeney v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Disability Lawyers Dell & Schaefer
Florida court finds Aetna’s denial of long term disability benefits was supported by the medical record which showed plaintiff could work in a sedentary job.Mercado v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
It does so not because the procedure kills the fetus, not because it risks worse complications for the woman than alternative procedures would do, not because it is a crueler or more painful or more disgusting method of terminating a pregnancy, but because the state wishes to make a statement of opposition to constitutional doctrine. [read post]