Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
Cariou v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
The new case, Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
(v) Like many other US FTAs, the US-China trade deal establishes that there should be ‘criminal procedures and penalties’ available for ‘theft, fraud, physical or electronic intrusion and unauthorized or improper use of a computer system’ for trade secret misappropriation (Art. 1.8). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Martin Vauclair, Patrick Healy et Stephen W. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
First Interstate Bank, Sheridan Wyoming et al.Citation: 2010 WY 143Docket Number: S-10-0022URL: Unavailable at this timeAppeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, Honorable Dan Spangler, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Martin Vauclair, Patrick Healy et Stephen W. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
Let’s talk about yesterday’s hearing in Glossip v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:55 am
Patrick R. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
Patrick Tucker of DefenseOne writes that the “Ukrainian conflict represents the most significant use of drones in warfare on two opposite sides of a battlefield. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 am
The case involves a defense objection under Batson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
See also Hines v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:39 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
A series of cases sought to clarify the defence in s123, for the benefit of brand owners, the most definitive of which was Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130. [read post]
