Search for: "People v High"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 15,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
The decisions in MI v HSE [2010] IEHC 159 and in P v A Secondary School [2010] IEHC 189 help to clarify, to some extent, the courts’ attitude to interagency cooperation. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
In Nunn v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
This past week, a different high court sat to hear a new privacy challenge in Jones v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
This past week, a different high court sat to hear a new privacy challenge in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
On 20 November 2009 BM issued a claim form in the High Court seeking to have the Order set aside. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:54 am
Given all the special privileges that corporations have enjoyed for so long, it’s high time corporate boards include the people who constitute more than half the ‘persons’ in America. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:54 am
W]e think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it in the manner most beneficial to the people. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
The decision in Benjamin v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:26 am
According to an article in People Magazine, Mr. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:05 am
CJLF wrote an amicus brief in this case supporting Texas.It was no surprise in the case of Moore v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:17 am
He was also definitely intending to deceive people -- to make people at the Water District (to which he had just been elected) think he was a "big deal". [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
The Guardian had a piece “‘They’re killing people’: Biden slams Facebook for Covid disinformation”. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
However, late in 2014, in People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 5:21 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:56 am
(See Moss v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
"The Supreme Court Rules Against Judicial Review of Expedited Removal (Lawfare Blog, July 2020) [text]- Refers to Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
