Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
Irwin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
That at least would frame the debate around familiar principles, even if the kind of harm involved remained beyond bounds. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
Most people aren’t, even if they have heard of it. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
The additional information may tempt regulators to intervene in markets in ways that would undermine long-term market resilience and exceed jurisdictional bounds. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:50 am
Skyscraper originalism views the Constitution as more or less a finished product (albeit always subject to later Article V amendment). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm
GDLS-C employees 2,100 people in London, an supports a supply chain of about 500 small and medium-sized Canadian businesses. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
Zolg v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
Stephenson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
I want the reader to be able to quickly find the answers to the questions they have about law because I expect it to be used by people bound by tight deadlines. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From D.O. v. [read post]
