Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 3301 - 3320 of 5,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
Enough people think this case may have legs that a whopping fourteen amicus briefs were filed supporting the petition. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:53 pm by Steve Lubet
After the opening brief on appeal was filed, the Illinois Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:28 pm by Carl Shusterman
, I finally found the time to read the Supreme's new decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:41 pm by Harry Styron
Here’s how the Arkansas court of appeals looked at the case, DeSoto Gathering Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:27 am by GuestPost
There is a concern, however, with the level of cross-referencing in the Interim Report to what will be addressed in the proposed Capacity Legislation. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
 When the Supreme Court issues decisions like it did in    Bowles v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 It is much easier for the prosecutor to introduce such evidence in an sexual assault trial.In the People v Watkins case, the Michigan Supreme Court, recognizing the irresolvable conflict between the evidentiary rule and the statute, held that the statute controls. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:18 am by Dean Freeman
This is especially true in cases when a person hasn’t so clearly crossed the line. [read post]