Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 39,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
The court's opinion in that case, Cook v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 10:39 am
Describing the Court's emergency injunction in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
Laws may change and may not apply to your case. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm
The incident, in which three people had died and eight others had been injured, had caused much emotion and controversy in Switzerland. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Many people assume a criminal case ends upon conviction and sentencing. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
Yeah, it's a hassle that some people drive in cans from Arizona to redeem them in California. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:15 am
In Peredia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Vesting health insurance rightsHandy v Schoharie County, Appellate Division 244 A.D.2d 842In the Handy case, the Appellate Division said a legislative body may adopt of a resolution that alters a retiree's health insurance benefits and that such a change can be legally applied to people who retired prior to the vote to change benefits.In December 1995, the Schoharie County Board of Supervisors adopted three motions changing its policy with respect to its providing… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
In Fabrau, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:36 pm
In Fabrau, L.L.C. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm
In the case before the New York court, People v Perkins, border agents stopped a traveler at JFK International Airport after a flight from Canada. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:14 am
That may be appropriate because the defendant may bear the burden of proving that the user was sophisticated. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:59 am
But it does not necessarily result in an unfair trial as illustrated by the Second Department's decision last week in People v Coston, 2007 NY Slip Op 06709. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A Counter-Example: Miranda v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
