Search for: "People v. Short" Results 3301 - 3320 of 8,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 2:59 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Publishers are leveraging their editorial reputation to launch content studios, but the content often falls short. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Today in People v Nieves-Andino, 2007 NY Slip Op 05584, the Court of Appeals held there was such an emergency under the following circumstances. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Andrew Koppelman
They were writing to critique Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am by Giles Peaker
Her youngest daughter has sensory processing disorder, severe social anxiety and will not speak to people she does not know, (iii) delay in the correct support would lead to a deterioration of the claimant’s youngest daughter’s mental health (supported by a letter from a Specialist CAMHS nurse), (iv) the claimant’s partner suffers from severe depression and anxiety and, after viewing the accommodation, he became “very withdrawn and anxious” and, (v)… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
 In 2010, 14,772 people were murdered. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by SHG
Since the opinions were released yesterday morning, the blawgosphere has cranked out a ton of posts about what the Jones v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:59 am by Russell Jackson
I finally got around to reading Judge Denise Cote's opinion in case that sounds like the daily menu special at Gray's Papaya:  Weiner v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:00 am by Frank Cranmer
In short: “If it had had jurisdiction, the Board would not have allowed the appeal” [75]. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:32 pm by Michael Risch
As many who follow such things know, ABC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by privacylawyer
There is a case from Ontario called R. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Andrew Delaney
 The short version is that the SCOV majority does not agree. [read post]