Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:41 am
This case tells us that there is no getting around a bad performance record when you are suing for employment discrimination.The case is Wright v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:27 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Only the negligent hiring, training, and supervision claim survived the employer’s partial motion to dismiss (Richardson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
Recently, a California federal court examined this very issue in Sweet v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
Supreme Court in Burke v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
Byrd v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
This judgment will give all people who work on factory sites additional protection in their working environment. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
Breitstein, v Page 5 Aaronson, 3 AD3d 588 [2d Dept. 2004]; Colicci v Ruhm, 20 AD3d 891 [4th Dept. 2005]), where there is conclusive evidence that the petitioner is not the biological father (Matter of Thomas, 287 AD2d 642 [2d Dept. 2001]), or where the father was temporarily compelled to pay excess support solely due to the court's improper application of the child support statute (People ex rel. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 9:48 am
Panel V. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
(See People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
” Among other reasons, the information was derived solely from LinkedIn’s transactions with the plaintiffs and not from third parties, LinkedIn was not a “consumer reporting agency” under the Act, and the list of possible references was not, itself, used or intended to be used for an employment purpose (Sweet v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
Mattocks v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
Nothing in the statute restricts its application solely to harmful conduct directed at children (see, People v Bergerson, 17 [95 N.Y.2d 372] NY2d 398, 401 [noting that the prior version of statute was intended to be broad in scope]). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
” Yes, he is proposing eviction and homelessness as an ‘incentive to work’, regardless of people’s situation. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 1:50 pm
” (Quoting People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
A fine is unconstitutionally excessive if it “notably exceeds in amount that which is reasonable, usual, proper or just” (People v Saffore, 18 NY2d 101, 104 [1966]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm
Levow fights the rights of people who are facing New Jersey DWI charges. [read post]
