Search for: "People v. To"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 72,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 5:46 am
People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:38 am
how did Day find these videos–was it by following people she knew personally, or did she randomly stumble on it, in which case how did the videos get into the poster’s hands? [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:08 pm
In Atlantic v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Hochstein et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:14 am
Here is the order in People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
Several people reported that Karl Rove quoted our Blagojevich / Powell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:56 am
UPDATE: Blowing Cash in Vegas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:44 am
Assault v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:00 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Such was the case in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
Sang Seok Na v Malik & Assoc., P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 30831(U) March 20, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 100962/2017 Judge: David B. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The decision will therefore benefit many other young people like the appellant who have been living in the UK since a young age. [read post]
