Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes… [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
The vendors named in the case were Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Koch Indus., Inc., 971 F.2d 548, 552 (10th Cir.1992); United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the most on-point United States Supreme Court decision in the area. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:57 am
The court addressed the problem of so-called "deliberate two-step" strategies employed by law enforcement to obtain a self-implicating statement from a suspect before a Miranda warning, and then using that statement to obtain a confession post-Miranda in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  He used the five-factor test for determining whether plaintiffs have antitrust standing articulated by the Supreme Court in Associated Federal Contractors of California, Inc. v. [read post]