Search for: "STATE v BURNS"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
State of Indiana (NFP) James Sapp v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
In Nightlight Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:56 am
See State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:35 am
& Roseanne Shuger v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Dennis Crouch summarizes oral arguments for the upcoming KSR v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:44 pm
" Here is the abstract:This paper 1) notices that Booker uprooted the statutory basis for the departure concept, suggesting that courts are at liberty to deviate from precedent rooted in the pre-Booker concept; 2) explains why Rule 32(i)(1)(C) as read by Burns v United States requires notice prior to sua sponte non-Guidelines sentences in those jurisdictions that require a distinct legal determination if a non-Guidelines sentence is warranted; and 3) discusses… [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 5:42 am
Case Name: Witherspoon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976), and its successors. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, Secret DOJ Memo Explains Why the Flag Burning Amendment is Unnecessary (June 8, 2006)32. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:54 am
Burns v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
In this subsection, "professional" means an individual who is licensed or certified by the state or who is an employee of a facility licensed, certified, or operated by the state and who, in the normal course of official duties or duties for which a license or certification is required, has direct contact with children. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
Hearing at State College, Feb. 28 and March 1, 2006. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
In 1997, in State Oil v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
(as Sandy notes - see 163) In today's world, Americans associate prospective constitutional amendments with efforts to alter rights, such as abortion, gay marriage, and flag burning. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
If one expends more than is consumed, the body makes up for the caloric deficit by burning existing fat stores. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 11:37 am
As set forth in the complaint in Hadar v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 3:42 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 11:38 am
" Thompson v Thompson, 105 P3d 346, 352 (2004). [read post]
