Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 23,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
As noted in my last blog post, the California Supreme Court just reversed the appellate court decision in the case of Steiner v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
’” The court distinguished Contec Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 10:48 pm
Suburban Leisure Center, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:10 am
” Maybe they can sell t-shirts? [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:41 am
The Sixth Circuit then upheld the district court’s factual findings and its balancing of those findings pursuant to Frisch’s Rests., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:40 pm
’” Farmer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 2:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:26 am
The five factors are (i) a sound idea (ii) a prototype (iii) a quality management team (iv) strategic relationships, and (v) product rollout/sales. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:00 pm
Leading Jewelers Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:09 pm
I'm tempted to say "slow news day," but it apparently wasn't slow to the editors of the HT: We've got a four-column, triple deck headline on the story out of the Supreme Court (this was a Tuesday morning): T.V.A Wins Right to Sell Power In 8-1 Supreme Court Decision Applying Only to Wilson DamMore formally, that would be Ashwander v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
Meyer Intellectual Properties Limited v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:17 am
Eros, LLC et al v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm
In Rolnick v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
In Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 2, 2006) (“when a hospital provides the surgeon with hardware to perform a surgical procedure, it is performing a service and not selling a product”); Herrick v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:39 pm
V&T Meat and Food, Calgary, Alberta and Hiep Thanh Trading, Edmonton, Alberta, are recalling certain raw pork products from the marketplace due to possible E. coli O157:H7 contamination. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
The standard for confusion is rather low, as eloquently explained by Justice Foster in Morningstar Corp Society v Express Newspaper [1979] FSR. 113: “if a moron in a hurry would be misled. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
The Court has a case on its docket involving that very dispute, and Tuesday’s ruling will be followed up soon, perhaps by next week, with action on that case — California Regents v. [read post]
