Search for: "State v. A. Lewis" Results 3301 - 3320 of 4,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 67  is  not a housing case as such, I hope that many of our readers will still find this useful and interesting. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of McGee v Lewis KB-2023-002435. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
. * * * Dear Chairman Lewis, Ranking Member Kelly, and Members of the Committee: Many thanks for inviting me to testify about "How the Tax Code Subsidizes Hate. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
On 17 to 20 March 2020 HHJ Lewis heard the trial in the case of JQL v NTP. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
The most famous second thought in recent decades is attributed to the late Justice Lewis Powell. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by INFORRM
Articles and Discussions “Mean streets” Rod Dadak (Lewis Silkin), Solicitors Journal S.J. (2010) Vol.154 No.41 pg.7. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am by Anna Christensen
  He is a frequent commentator on constitutional issues and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
We do not here decide that dispute about the new rule; as we stated in Lewis v. [read post]