Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 427 F.3d 446 (2005) that federal courts retained jurisdiction because the TCPA's provision authorizing private actions in state court did not declare state jurisdiction to be exclusive.The petition for review is Mims v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The District Court will hear the case. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The District Court dismissed Reed’s complaint. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
First, the court distinguishes Fox v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
(Will Baude) I learned today on Twitter that Orin’s one-page article, A Theory of Law was cited in its first judicial opinion. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
Plaintiff files in state court. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
This was the approach first taken by the Warren Court in 1955 in Williamson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 12:51 pm
The Supreme Court, in its decision last June in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am
Last year in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm
District Court Judge William M. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
District Court Judge in Michigan issued recently in a civil suit: Enjaian v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Two years ago, the Court heard arguments in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
(Eugene Volokh) That’s the scenario in a 6–1 decision of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court (which comes out in plaintiff’s favor, on the question of whether his case can proceed) in Blackhouse v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 4:01 am
Appeals Administrative/Labour Law: Standard of Review; Grievances ArbitrationYork Region District School Board v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
There is a lot to like about United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, via summary order, vacated a district court’s grant of Starbucks’s request to serve wide-ranging subpoenas on its rank-and-file employees in a 10(j) proceeding, a decision that may augur how appellate courts will view the emerging employer practice of seeking extensive rank-and-file state-of-mind discovery in future temporary injunction actions by the Government.In Leslie v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
” Indeed, as the court stated in 2010 in Holder v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
But jurisdiction is one of the foundational elements upon which our judicial systems, both state and federal, are built. [read post]