Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 3301 - 3320 of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
The “American rule” that each party pays their own attorney’s fees does not apply in drain code appeals, according to the Court of Appeals’ decision in Arath IV, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:38 am by InhouseBlog
“The legal industry gained 1,900 jobs in July, the third month of increases after losing 68,000 jobs in April. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the leading judgment Lord Carnwath stated that the question was how the element of chance was provided “in the game”. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am by Michael Lowe
  One good bit of news in all that mess is the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Simply stated, unless the offense is found to constitute “egregious misbehavior,” the penalty of dismissal is unlikely to be imposed for a first, or even a second, offense.Except in cases involving egregious misbehavior, progressive discipline theory emphasizes behavior modification to rehabilitate the worker by imposing increasing severe penalties for repeated employee misbehavior in recognition of the economic cost to the employer of losing and replacing a trained… [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 If EPA has done its homework, the Sacketts will lose on the merits. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court rejected the individual’s claim that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under Education Law §3020-a, and the award terminating petitioner's employment is a violation of public policy and New York State Law.Perry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]