Search for: "State v. Sessions"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 6,576
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
It provides, in relevant part:(a) Each United States magistrate judge serving under this chapter shall have within the district in which sessions are held by the court that appointed the magistrate judge, at other places where that court may function, and elsewhere as authorized by law--(1) all powers and duties conferred or imposed . . . by law or by the Rules of Criminal Procedure[.]28 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:07 am
Facts – This case (State of North Carolina v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
On Wednesday, 11 May 2015 AIPPI UK and Oxford's Intellectual Property Research Centre are holding a session entitled "A Brave New World - an in depth look at the EU Trade Mark reforms" at the London office of Simmons & Simmons. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm
The counterterrorism strategy session held in Germany will include German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
State oversight and greater transparency and accountability since creation of the Fair Defense Act and the Indigent Defense Commission.2/3: Two major lawsuits: Rothgery v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm
Tech experts and industry representatives squared off against law enforcement officials in two sessions of lively testimony today in front of the House Energy and Commerce committee. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
(division des Aliments Krispy Kernels inc.) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm
UTELCOM, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 7:52 am
The NLRB’s cross-application for enforcement was granted (Fort Dearborn Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:58 am
The landmark Supreme Court case Newburgh v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:51 am
In Grubaugh v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Brian noted that, contrary to the suggestions made in the earlier judiciary session, the English and the Germans are not always in harmony. [read post]
