Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 5,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
” Sometimes trying to fit a data breach issue into the traditional coverage is like trying to pound a square peg into a round hole. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
In Grand Prospect Partners, LP, v Ross Dress for Less Inc., Ross was negotiating with a shopping center owner Porterville, in Tulare County. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:30 am
And with the Ninth Circuit's decision on July 5 in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Signs (or trade marks) having any of the provenances described in para 5 above are squarely within this description. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 3:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
The District Court, however, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims and remanded them back to Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions in Brnovich v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
” The language comes from the case of Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Entitled "The Protection of Corporate Reputations", it's led by Martin Howe QC(8 New Square) and Justin Rushbrooke QC (5RB), who will consider the current state of the law for protecting corporate reputations. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:34 am
"Stevens Law Office v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:23 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the verdict and finds the officer did not have qualified immunity because the jury found that plaintiff was not resisting arrest after the first tasing.The case is Jones v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
This case, Fields v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
This case, Fields v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm
JAMS, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
A week before the Federal Circuit's appellate hearing on Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
