Search for: "State v. Washington"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 17,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2025, 7:03 am
United States, on the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions, and Stanley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
United States, with Steven F. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm
London School of Economics (winner) Tbilisi State University v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:31 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
Doctor’s Associates Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:20 pm
Circuit denies rehearing en banc in Parker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Ratifications were exchanged at Washington on December 2, 1980. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:19 pm
The Washington Court of Appeals issued a published decision last week in the matter of Ken Bricker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 5:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 3:31 am
High court asked to curtail forum shopping in patent suits [Washington Legal Foundation on TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:20 am
In Washington-El v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:39 pm
On June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court decided RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
There is no dispute that, during the capital trial of petitioner Davel Chinn, the State suppressed exculpatory evidence indicating that the State’s key witness, Marvin Washington, had an intellectual disability that may have affected Washington’s ability to remember, perceive fact from fiction, and testify accurately....Because Chinn’s life is on the line, and given the substantial likelihood that the suppressed records would have changed… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:17 am
Edwards v. [read post]
