Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 15,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 3:08 am
The distinct problems that each of these basic understanding faces ultimately lead to the contours of a new paradigm for the study of international courts as actors exercising public authority. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:41 pm
Jones, History, Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, and Law, U-M.More information is here. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:35 am
She was the president pro tem of the Senate for a period and also served a single day as acting state governor. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
(United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
(United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am
According to independent studies, Michigan auto insurance companies lead the nation in profitability. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
The Second Circuit decided Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:56 am
Here is the abstract: We present the results of the first empirical study of the extent to which businesses have switched to arbitration after AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Graham and Sullivan v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm
Yet, as has been stated, what responsibilities Mr Shafron had was a question of fact. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
39.6 / 23.5 / 36.2On Graham v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Gelernter examines the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:58 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:41 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the judge appeared to be strongly influenced by the state of the prior art, as represented by the evidence upon which InfoTrack relied for its novelty and innovative step cases.Encompass has appealed that decision (Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd, NSD734/2018) to a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 10:51 am
Court cited United States v. [read post]
