Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
Apple has won the first Apple v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
The nursing standard of care in Illinois: rethinking the Wingo exception in the wake of … (Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
In Wilkow v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm
Sullivan), and movie theatres (Freedman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
Lefoumba v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
FTC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
SULLIVAN, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
Iqbal[x] and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:03 am
Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 (1963). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
