Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 10,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
” The class was certified by the district court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23(b)(3) which states “A class action may be maintained if Rule 23(a) is satisfied and if . . . the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
Sacramento Superior Court Judge Shelleyanne Chang halted the process in late February. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
Last month, an amicus brief was filed on behalf of the California Medical Association, California Dental Association, California Hospital Association, and the American Medical Association. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court issues its opinion.It's a 6-1. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 5:00 pm
In November 2010, following extended mediation, the parties filed a stipulated judgment—a divorce settlement—with a California Superior Court judge. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:41 am
California Superior Court approved child support calculators For those of you who, like me are less mathematically inclined, there are two computer programs certified by the Judicial Council for use in all California courts. [read post]
29 May 2016, 8:17 am
One was an Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jeffrey S. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Following the release of the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Carter, the leader of the Liberal Party expressed support for the decision and made a motion in the House of Commons to appoint a special committee to ‘consider the ruling of the Supreme Court; that the committee consult with experts and with Canadians, and make recommendations for a legislative framework that will respect the Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the priorities of Canadians. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:31 pm
More About Website ADA Claims: Some readers may recall my recent post in which I discussed a California state court decision in which the court held that a retailer violated the Americans with Disabilities Act because its website was not accessible to a visually-impaired plaintiff. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:26 am
The bill also purports to grant exclusive jurisdiction for any disputes relating to non-compete agreements in the Massachusetts superior courts or the Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk County superior court. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 12:54 pm
That's true in California state court. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:00 am
To obtain a Certificate of Rehabilitation an individual or their attorney must file a petition with the California Superior Court. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:00 am
To obtain a Certificate of Rehabilitation an individual or their attorney must file a petition with the California Superior Court. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:29 am
Disabled rights litigators, assisted by the Obama administration, have been battering away at these precedents for years, and in March they secured a significant win as a California Superior Court judge ordered a private company, Colorado Bag ‘N’ Baggage, to pay $4,000 to a blind customer and revise its website. [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:04 pm
In a recent published opinion, the California Court of Appeal answered in the negative.Babbitt v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:50 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:41 am
Protesters stood in front of the Kern County Superior Court and held signs that read, “protection of our rights” and “stop police brutality. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
Superior Court.2013In American Express Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:30 pm
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443 (Cal. 2007), the California Supreme Court held that a class-action waiver in an employment contract was unenforceable when the waiver would prevent employees from vindicating their rights. [read post]
