Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 3301 - 3320 of 49,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
And our dual-sovereignty test makes this historical fact dispositive: If an entity’s authority to enact and enforce criminal law ultimately comes from Congress, then it cannot follow a federal prosecution with its own. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:13 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
This decision serves as a warning to law enforcement officials who believe they can run roughshod over the rights of certain people and won't be held accountable. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
  While thirteen people were arrested for a range of offences, the police believed that another 15 or 20 participated in the violence but had not been identified. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:35 am by Mark Tushnet
I'm afraid that I have an unbearably simple-minded view of Christie v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Board of Education of Immigration Law, which appears in the North Carolina Law Review 91 (2013). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although there is no question that a trial court "necessarily has broad discretion to control and restrict the scope of the voir dire examination" (People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135, 140, rearg denied 29 NY2d 670, cert denied 405 US 995; see People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199), we conclude under the circumstances of this case that the court erred in failing to permit defense counsel to conduct further questioning of the prospective juror to determine whether she… [read post]