Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
"With all the money he had, he didn't have to bribe a judge. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:36 am
"I don't think we'll get it passed in this session," Meehan said. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
They almost always get named as experts so we don't bother to try to keep their testimony out.2. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:26 am
Kenji Yoshino, at Slate’s Convictions blog, wondered whether the federal courts will ever invalidate the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:12 pm
We didn't hear any of that testimony. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
Although that case involved copyright, not trademarks, its reasoning seems highly analogous--ESPECIALLY when combined with the first fact that "copycat goods" aren't per se illegal. 2) the facts don’t specify what metatags were used, but we know that (a) Google ignores keyword metatags and (b) judges mistakenly think that keyword metatags are the holy grail of SEO. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
The Eleventh Circuit didn't take a view on whether reasonable suspicion was required, however, as the defendant hadn't challenged that issue. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
We don't know what the penalty for conviction will be next month or next year. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
I don't think that the First understands this. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
We shouldn't make it for them. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
The number may be higher, lawyers say, because public files don't always reflect whether a judge credited a defendant for helping the government..... [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
What was said we don't know, and the government response says "No recording or written record of the conversation was made. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:53 am
For the time being, make sure that you don't pretend to be anyone you're not on the internet. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
But I don't think such pretrial restraint of speech, based on one judge's determination of likelihood of success on the merits, is consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:23 am
As a Boston personal injury lawyer, I don’t have a problem with settlement agreements, in principle. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Accordingly, I don't rule out the possibility that the movement reaches a critical mass. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:45 am
Unlike others, however, I don't understand too much of what I read. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:00 pm
I don't often reread non-fiction, but in the case of Dean Strang's wonderful book about the trial of a group of Milwaukee anarchists in 1917, I did so. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
We cannot agree.WEC Carolina contributes to a dialogue among the circuit courts on the reach of § 1030(a)(2). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
Yet when we walk into a courtroom, we're no longer directing our attorneys or staff -- who act at our beck and call -- or controlling the fates of large businesses and institutions -- instead we're talking to six guys or gals in tank tops or bedroom slippers who don't give a hail who you are. [read post]
