Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 3301 - 3320 of 29,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 12:33 pm
Everything that Justice Benke says in today's opinion is correct.Except I'd delete the third footnote.The Court of Appeal is correct that there was personal jurisdiction (as well as proper service) over the defendant, who received real property in California from a debtor as a fraudulent conveyance. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:14 pm
[The following guest post was written by Kimberly Wallis also of Sabey Rule LLP.]In the recent British Columbia Supreme Court case of Becker v Becker, 2016 BCSC 487, the executor of the will of Ann Andrews sought to prove her will in solemn form after its validity was formally challenged by those who would benefit under a previous will. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:15 am by Marc Poirier
  I’ll summarize some of my arguments, as well as my contribution to one of the Lewis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:00 pm
Both here -- in the arbitration context -- as well as elsewhere.So let's hear it for the Ginsberg-Scalia-Kennedy-Souter-Thomas party. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Commentary The Supreme Court’s decision will be closely scrutinised by representatives of the transport industry and passenger groups alike, and may well come to play an important role in the pending appeal in Thibodeau v Air Canada, soon to be heard by the Canadian Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United States would be a radically different place had it not been for “the great,the good, the wise” John Marshall, as he was described by another famous and well-respected Supreme Court Justice, Joseph Story. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:44 am by Amy Howe
” Relying on the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:14 pm by Tony Mauro
In a speech last night, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens made clear his displeasure with the Court's recent decision in Connick v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am by John Bursch
  For example, I was never even asked about Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Josh Gupta-Kagan, University of South Carolina School of Law, has posted Stanley v. [read post]
Of the seven Justices on the Court, Justices Wiggins and Hecht did not participate in the decision. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
 Exhibit A is the Court's 1991 decision in Payne v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]