Search for: "Williams v. Williams"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 17,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:01 pm
Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Care Improvement Act)Williams v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:24 pm
Discrimination/RetaliationWilliams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:09 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
William Jimenez, No. 21-2954 (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:29 am
William Gagne, Jr. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(Superior Court of Stanislaus County, No. 624500, William A. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
California (1941) – Clare PastoreRemaking the “Law of the Poor”: Williams v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:07 am
By William W. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
By William W. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:58 pm
Here is Professor Friedman The Great with initial thoughts. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:29 am
The next up in a series of confrontation cases. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
These efforts will likely intensify in the wake of Dobbs v. [read post]
