Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
It’s not business as usual in Canadian courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
” Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
Lau’s Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Turner, 512 U. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
À.R.L. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
See “U. of I. officials used personal email to hide discussions“. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
Kyles v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
” In People v Riso (Anthony) 2013 NY Slip Op 50437(U) Decided on March 27, 2013 Appellate Term, First Department, the defendant sought to have his conviction overturned for shoplifting after he pleaded guilty to New York’s “shoplifting crime” of New York Penal Law 155.25 by arguing, in part, that there was not sufficient asportation. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 10:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:18 am
Alvarez & Seff v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:08 am
Swift & Co., 323 U. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
The Union commanders were well aware of Stuart's position BEFORE Pickett's movement began. [read post]
