Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 3321 - 3340 of 9,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2016, 9:08 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court  Miranda v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
” Coverage comes from the Arizona Daily Star and Arizona Public Media. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:20 pm by Joe Consumer
This week, the state Supreme Court “found the township and DEP were protected from liability in the case because they are government agencies. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:26 am by Jay W. Belle Isle
Today, I’m going to walk you through a few things: one, the utter idiocy of the Arizona Supreme Court decision; two, the fact that it may not necessarily as bad as it sounds; and three, that despite number two, it is something about which we should be concerned. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford, the infamous Supreme Court decision holding that neither slaves nor their descendants could claim any rights as citizens of the country they helped to build or of any of its States – a holding reversed in the very first sentence of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 11:21 pm by Robert Stanley
I’m not aware of any cases that have been decided by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court that references how or when a court should divide extracurricular activities. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
A new report from an Arizona Supreme Court task force explores the costs of pretrial penalties, fees, and cash-bail policies. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 3:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
Enlarge (credit: Peter Kelly) In a unanimous decision, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Monday that the police overstepped when an officer warrantlessly searched the phone belonging to a man who had been an overnight guest at a female neighbor’s apartment. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Michael Grossman
If the Supreme Court takes a microscope to the Constitution and finds some way to apply its laws to impose harsh new rules against sex offenders, then so be it. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
In Justice Scalia’s earliest criminal law decision for the Court, Arizona v. [read post]
” And if and when the issue makes its way to the Supreme Court, overly broad district court (or circuit court) injunctions that prevent other courts from hearing cases and weighing in can “deprive the Supreme Court of the benefit of decisions from several courts of appeals,” a diversity of viewpoint the Court uses to decide the best nationwide outcomes. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
Federal Election Commission (aggregate contribution limits), and Arizona Free Enterprise v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:02 pm by Kamran Mirrafati
This split amongst the federal appellate courts sets the stage for a Supreme Court showdown. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:28 am by Jon Sands
  The 9th employs AEDPA deference to conclude that the state's appellate court decision was  neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]