Search for: "C/T"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 50,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Policy default should be rebuttable presumption against IP for innovation, b/c exclusive rights are sticky; can hurt progress. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
B/c we live in a democratic society, not b/c we have preferences for news. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:06 am
So as we say an early goodbye to Webcasting III (though we didn’t think so, we may yet miss you!) [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:34 am
As you know, Bob, § 1125(c) (3)(C) of the Act provides that “[a]ny noncommercial use of a mark” “shall not be actionable as dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment under this subsection. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
The referral in Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds, C-201/13 concerned the notion of ‘parody’. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
It can’t be both. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:36 am
One doesn’t find this kind of flagrant counterfeiting in Canada. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 3:31 am
With the forthcoming ruling in C‑579/23 P, the Commission (for wines, spirits and agricultural products) and the EUIPO (for non-agri products) may see their competences expanded. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
§§ 812.012(10(a)(1), 812.014(2)(c)(1), Fla. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am
I’m not sure that argument works so I wouldn’t make it today. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 4:22 am
In Re Pellot Córdova (ética). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The respective examples clearly contain all three components (a), (b), and (c) of the claimed preparations. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
” Read Jeremy C. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
” Read Jeremy C. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:12 pm
From the Associated Press: Aretha Franklin could lose her home to tax collectors. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm
March madness wasn't confined to college basketball this weekend. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm
C. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am
Troll behavior: responsive arguments were that troll concerns were unfounded: there isn’t a design patent market b/c they protect brand identity; hard to use design patents to threaten entire mkt b/c designing around is easy; to the extent we think troll behavior is from nuisance suits from end users, they don’t have much profits to give, so disgorgement isn’t any worse for them. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:46 pm
While it can reduce costs, things still aren’t cheap. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Rihanna: High Court decided this was passing off, on the merit of those particular facts, b/c there had been a previous relationship w/Rihanna and Top Shop. [read post]
