Search for: "D. K."
Results 3321 - 3340
of 9,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect R 6/11 remains an accurate reference, because at least the alleged defects (c) and also (d) overlap the violation of the right to be heard as intended by the petitioner in the present case: under the heading of a violation of the right to be heard and other defect, the petitioner then was also challenging the very reasons of the decision, arguing that the Board of Appeal did not explain, or not enough, or not in a logical sequence, why the petitioner’s arguments were… [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
A process for the production of olefins comprising passing a synthetic naphtha to a steam cracker wherein at least a portion of the synthetic naphtha is converted to olefins characterised in that the synthetic naphtha is a combined synthetic naphtha produced from a process comprising a) contacting a synthesis gas stream at an elevated temperature and pressure with a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor to generate a hydrocarbon product stream b) separating the hydrocarbon product… [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This obligation that is derived from the fundamental procedural principle of the right to be heard has also found an expression in A 112a(2)(d) in connection with R 104(a), in the context of substantial procedural violations.[2.2] In its response dated August 20, 2009, the [applicant] had filed a request for a “hearing” (“Anhörung”) in case the ED intended to refuse the present application […]. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Further on, it is stated that “[d]uring operation of the pump, ... the safety interlock status is continuously monitored and if the status changes from “SET LOADED” TO “FAULT”, the controller will stop operating the pump” [emphasis added]. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The Board is of the opinion that – because of the circumstances of the alleged disclosure, in particular of D8, without any obligation to maintain secrecy – it is appropriate to hear the witnesses under A 117(1)(d).[2.2] During the oral proceedings (OPs) before the Board, the [patent proprietor] requested the Board not to hear the witnesses. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks Climate… [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Eccles (Saïd Business School), Richard Gardiner, and Andrea Webster, World Benchmarking Alliance, on Friday, April 26, 2024 Tags: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD, EU, Sustainability That Starbucks DEI Case Doesn’t Stand for What You Think It Does Posted by Scott Shepard, Stefan Padfield, and Ethan Peck (The National Center for Public Policy Research), on Saturday, April 27, 2024 Tags: dei, discrimination, Race, Shareholders, Starbucks Climate… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Vericheck, C06-1132JLR (WDWA, 2007), aff’d __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. 2009), after losing in Vericheck, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 7:48 pm
To get on this list, you'd need to add the corporate law key designation K22, which I, for one, never do. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 6:56 am
Irrelevant sei hierbei, dass der Blog-Kommentator nicht beruflich tätig ist, weil dieser sich von vornherein nicht direkt auf den Quellenschutz berufen könne. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
In particular, it provides that the European patent application shall be deemed never to have had the effects of provisional protection when it has been withdrawn, deemed to be withdrawn or “finally refused” (German version: “rechtskräftig zurückgewiesen” - French version: “rejetée en vertu d’une décision passée en force de chose jugée”). [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:24 am
Queste misure appaiono particolarmente giustificate nei casi in cui […] "unjustified request" / "particularly justified in those cases where" HU […] amelyek szükségesek a megalapozatlan kérelemből adódóan az alperes oldalán felmerült költségek és okozott kár fedezésére. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè; A-tún-orí-tí-kò… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
nda döküm i? [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
Décision T528/07, à lire aussi sur le blog K's Law. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
Boston Criminal Lawyer Lefteris K. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:20 am
Kabins that many of my clients want to k now whether they should be asking for a transfer of care to a neurosurgeon, or instead, to an orthopedic surgeon, when it appears that they may need a back or a neck surgery. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
Thistlethwaite, John D. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:24 am
Canadian green energy law and policy / Fred D. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
See also FDA, The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]/Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2014) at p. 6 (“principles of safety and effectiveness underlie the substantial equivalence determination in every 510(k) review”).But in fact, for most of the medical devices that enter the market today, grandfathering is irrelevant. [read post]
