Search for: "Doe 74"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 3,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
IPBiz has previously noted that Jaffe and Lerner's argument that prior art was missed in the evaluation of the '811 patent, specifically prior art published in JPTOS [74 JPTOS 315] , was in error.4. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:24 am
One does not see that Jaffe and Lerner investigated 74 JPTOS 315 to prove that this reference does anticipate the claims of US 6,049,811. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 10:44 pm
In the Deferred Life Plan, the second step, the life we defer, cannot exist, does not deserve to exist, without first doing something unsatisfying. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:29 am
Martin, 422 F.3d 597, 602-03 (7th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 74 U.S.L.W. 3424 (Jan. 23, 2006) (No. 05-8234). [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
The determination of whether a claim is statute barred by the limitation period does not fall within the discretion of the Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:41 am
Mr Wilfer ... appears to be asserting that the mere fact that a word describes an intended purpose of the goods or services to be covered by a proposed word mark does not suffice to preclude registration of that mark on the ground that it is descriptive. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
See id. at *74-76. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
He flushed the lines with saline, secured the catheter to the skin and put a clean dressing on, just as he always does. [read post]
27 May 2007, 9:50 am
" It does not provide any power for combat expenditures. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
What does all this have to with 2008? [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Goldstein points out that there are three Supreme Court seats in play as a result of the next election: Stevens, who is 87, Souter, who is 67 but is said to want to leave the Court, and Ginsburg, who is 74. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Justice Ginsburg is 74. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Justice Ginsburg is 74. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
V12, 74-76]. [read post]
10 May 2007, 12:24 am
"A Bill we MPs cannot afford to pass - Richard Shepherd MP, The Daily Telegraph "To try to change a law that we enacted so that the public's right of access to the whole of the public sector does not apply to what we ourselves do, would be a staggering misjudgement. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:04 pm
V12, 74-76]. [read post]
5 May 2007, 6:36 am
" Williams, 3 F.3d at 74 n.4 (citations omitted). [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:32 pm
However, Article 75(3) must be read as meaning that it applies only when the Lok Sabha does not stand dissolved or prorogued, the court ruled. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:41 pm
In other words, AACS does not stand a chance. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:17 am
" The question then is…what does "unduly interfere" mean? [read post]
