Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 7,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
So we fell all over ourselves when a Reed Smith associate, Kevin Hara, offered to update our cheat sheed on adverse event reports. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
”However note that "this does not mean authors can do as they please with their sources". [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
Thanks to last year’s decision in Connick v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
(Kevin Smith had an especially thoughtful post on the suit earlier this summer.) [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
" We also agree with the further contention of defendant that the fact that he received the bargained-for sentence does not preclude him from seeking our discretionary review of his sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (6) (b) (see People v Smith, 32 AD3d 553, 554; see generally People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519-520). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
" Rogers v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am
However, this is a civil duty which gives the tenant a right to claim money from the landlord and does not protect them against eviction, unless it is used as a defence to a claim for rent arrears. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:14 am
In fact, defendants in Silva Enters. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
State law in Indiana does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 211–12 (1982); Wong Wing v. [read post]
[Will Baude] Understanding the federal court ruling that allows an FLDS church leader not to testify
21 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Lots of folks on the internet have been talking about the recent district judge decision in Perez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
” At Ikuta Matata, Sean Smith wonders whether “Bucklew signal[s] a newly invigorated role for originalism in Eighth Amendment interpretation. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
Smith, 110 N.C. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
That is, in my view, exactly right and contrasts with the wholly mistaken view taken by the court in R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
Smith, 130 So. 440 (Fla. 1930)). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Additionally, the California Supreme Court addressed this very issue in Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:54 pm
Finally, Judge Ho also heavily criticizes Employment Division v. [read post]
