Search for: "Does 1-200" Results 3321 - 3340 of 4,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 2:25 pm
So what does this work cover? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:02 pm by pittsburghlawfirm
  Although a PFA does not create a criminal record per se (unless one violates the PFA and is found guilty of indirect criminal contempt), a PFA does appear on the civil docket as a finding of abuse, which the world can see, because the civil docket is public record. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:02 pm by pittsburghlawfirm
  Although a PFA does not create a criminal record per se (unless one violates the PFA and is found guilty of indirect criminal contempt), a PFA does appear on the civil docket as a finding of abuse, which the world can see, because the civil docket is public record. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:02 pm by pittsburghlawfirm
  Although a PFA does not create a criminal record per se (unless one violates the PFA and is found guilty of indirect criminal contempt), a PFA does appear on the civil docket as a finding of abuse, which the world can see, because the civil docket is public record. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:30 am by Lawrence Higgins
(Patently-O readers register with PO 200 for a discount). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:49 pm by Joe Palazzolo
”) As you can see, $24 million wouldn’t shatter any records, but it would be more than at least one of the companies in the Top Ten allegedly paid. 1) Siemens • Settlement Amount: $800 million in 2008 • Alleged Bribe Payments: $1.4 billion from 2001 to 2007 2) Kellogg Brown & Root/Halliburton* • Settlement Amount: $579 million in 2009 • Alleged Bribe Payments: $182 million from 1994 to 2004 3) BAE Systems • Settlement Amount: $400 million… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
 The National Honey Board is not a regulatory agency nor does it have powers of enforcement. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 7:34 am by Mandelman
    I’d offer to describe its taste, but for 10 straight days, I consumed only two foods and one drink: 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:27 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The adjusted figures show a rate of defeat between 1999 and 2010 of 1 in 70. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:54 am by Jonathan Bailey
The publisher had filed some 15 suits seeking information on 200 different sharers but had settled out of court with most for the minimum $750 damages under the law. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:15 am by Mandelman
  It is incomprehensible that our plight is not even close to being over, but it should be sincerely humbling that, as I write these words, we don’t even have a plan on a drawing board that one could credibly claim has even the remotest chance of abating a crisis that can only continue to break the economic back of our middle class, ultimately destroying our citizenry’s faith in what has been referred to as “The American Dream” for more than 200 years. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by Eric
But this case does provide an excellent example of the ridiculousness of anti-circumvention statutory damages [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 9:01 pm
Nor does the Columbus ordinance provide guidance as to how long and how intense animal noise must be to be “unreasonable”. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:58 pm by Andy Dorchak
The Supreme Court, to my knowledge, does not provide translations of its opinions into foreign languages.) [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
 Likewise, assumption of a maximum violation rate of $200 for each violation for every class member under PAGA claims was also speculative. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:15 pm by darren
As you can see, financial hardship does not discriminate. [read post]