Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 3321 - 3340 of 5,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm by Patricia Hughes
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  That is 11% higher than the white percentage of murderers in the 1976-2004 time frame,* 39%. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:20 am by David Conway
Why does Engle not choose to dwell on this negative consequence of feminism? [read post]
27 May 2020, 12:59 pm by Brad Schnure
Bucco Senator – District 25 Gerald Cardinale Senator – District 39 Christopher Connors Senator – District 9 Michael Doherty Senator – District 23 James Holzapfel Senator – District 10 Declan O’Scanlon Senator – District 13 Michael Testa Senator – District 1 Samuel Thompson Senator – District 12 [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 9:02 am
There, the idea was that it would be unconstitutional interference for Congress to enforce criminal laws prohibiting torture, if the torturing was done by the President's agents (pp. 33-39). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm by The Complex Litigator
In this situation, "the involuntary receipt of relief does not, of itself, prevent the class plaintiff from continuing as a class representative. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:59 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Additionally, their proposed “new pathway” allows for the IPs to be recognized as the child’s legal parents from birth (Recommendation 1). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:34 am
Ethnically, 42% of the homeless are about black, 39% white, 13% Latino, 4% Native American, and 2% Asian. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:53 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
The worker does need to show he or she was acting in the course and scope of employment. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:26 am
And so, we end up at the same question, “What does this have to do with you”? [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
  However, the Bill does not assist in this regard since it does not apply to any disclosure which contravenes the DPA (see for example clauses 32(7) and 41(7)). [read post]