Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 11:13 am
Hokto Kinoko Company v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:39 pm
Today's guest post was authored by Jon Rehm**, Esquire of the Nebraska Bar.Former New Jersey Governor Chris ChristieLawyers on “both sides of the v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
In plain English, that means the policy of indefinite detention by the military, without charge or trial, could be carried out here at home. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm
Moran v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 is a welcome reminder that the English Patents Court and Court of Appeal can, when required, deliver swift justice in a way that would be the envy of many IP Courts the world over. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
This is a view that has been endorsed by English judges in Lawlor (at para 3) and Aquavita International SA v Ashapura Minecham Ltd [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) [20], citing inter alia, older editions of Plender and Wilderpin. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
Lord Kitchin considered that this conclusion found support in Government of India v Taylor, where Viscount Simonds (at 508) had explained that the meaning of “liabilities” in s 302 of the Companies Act 1948 excluded obligations that were not enforceable in the English courts. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Yet whilst many states in the US recognise a ‘right of publicity’ – the right to control the commercialisation of their own image – such a right has never existed under English law. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:06 am
Multiple Definitions The new UK legislation states that the acquisition, use, or disclosure of a trade secret is unlawful where it “constitutes a breach of confidence in confidential information,” i.e., according to English common law. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
JD (Congo) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
Ct. 2162, 2171 (2019); First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
Contract law: Consider Campbell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:42 am
The Court’s opinion in Wall v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
" Likewise, Rosenblatt v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 4:21 am
In May 2024, the English Supreme Court handed down judgment in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV.[1] The Supreme Court found that MUR Shipping BV (MUR) was entitled to rely on a force majeure clause to suspend its obligations under the contract of affreightment between the parties. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm
That separate case is Texas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
