Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3321 - 3340 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
Although the Court doubted that the courts today would have invented such a rule, they accepted that the doctrine is a long-standing principle of English law, is common to almost all major systems of law, and that judicial abolishment would be inconsistent with the way the English common law system works. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am by INFORRM
  In the “Right to Be Forgotten” context, Google says that more than half of incoming requests fail to state valid legal claims. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by chief
” Seems like local housing authorities will be able to apply to the First-tier Tribunal for an order banning someone from letting housing in England, engaging in English letting agency work, or engaging in English property management work. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Kohler, Special Rules for State-owned Companies in European Civil Procedure? [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Starnes
Her husband, Rolando, has very limited hearing and communicates primarily in ASL, though he can sometimes communicate in English with difficulty. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am by Steve Vladeck
Plain English: Congress has precluded immigrants facing deportation from eligibility for a certain kind of relief if they were convicted of a crime under state law that is functionally similar to particular federal crimes. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:34 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Therefore neither Essers nor Kazemeir were bound by an English jurisdiction clause in the original contracts between Exel and the respondents. [read post]