Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3321 - 3340 of 6,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm by Ron Coleman
Ct. 2012), the court wrote: The second branch of the husbands motion seeks to dismiss the wifes thirteen affirmative defenses and sixteen counterclaims. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:50 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Div. 2004) (“hold harmless” provision in parties’ property settlement agreement did not require ex-husband to remove ex-wifes name from the mortgage)). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee, who began working for the husband and wife in 2004 as a nanny for their five-month-old son, was originally paid $350 per week. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 2:51 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  In this case, the denial of the ex-wifes motion to extend limited duration alimony was affirmed by the Appellate Division. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:37 am by Neil Cahn
Moreover, Justice Ecker properly based his $7,500 per month temporary maintenance award upon the wifes needs and the standard of living of the parties prior to commencement of the divorce action as the husbands “evidence of his gross income was insufficient, and was not reconcilable with his prior spending habits or the parties’ standard of living. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to plaintiff-husbands counsel, plaintiff-husband is a neurologist, and his ability to care for his patients has been severely impaired by the wife's conduct. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
  Marriage is defined as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,” and the word spouse “refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:53 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  In response to the Husbands motion for emancipation, the ctrial court ordered him to reimburse the former wife over $111,000. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:01 am by Ashley Russell
The Supreme Court reversed, holding Wifes legal fees were not a “community debt” for necessaries under the spousal support statue, thus Husband was not liable to pay Law Firm for legal services rendered to Wife. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Orders were then made that Mrs Papa was liable to Provident Capital and Mr Caramanlis was liable to Mrs Papa.Zurich insurance through their risk magazine recently pointed to a situation where an English solicitor that they spoke to told us that, when she had a meeting with a wife who had been asked to remortgage the matrimonial home to secure her husbands business debts, the wife had no idea what she was really being asked to do, i.e. put her home at… [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:30 am by Aaron Weems
In the Fox case, the wife obtained a temporary Protection From Abuse evicting the husband from the marital residence, as well as prohibiting any communication between the two of them. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Justice Palmieri denied the husbands request for a counsel fee. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:13 pm by Cicely Wilson
After a hearing, Husband and Wife agreed that the final decree would award Law Firm attorney fees against Wife only and would not award Wife attorney fees against Husband. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:27 am by Steven Gursten
Thomas was an unusual case because the wife was driving in a separate car, and came over to her husbands car after crash. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:36 am by Rich Vetstein
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:36 am by Rich Vetstein
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
Doris Attinger followed her husband Warren one day to his lover’s apartment. [read post]