Search for: "In v. United States" Results 3321 - 3340 of 102,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:01 am by Embassy Law
Without direct effects in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City held on January 21, 2011 in the matter Gosain v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
Without direct effects in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City held on January 21, 2011 in the matter Gosain v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent, General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd (“General Dynamics”), seeks to enforce an arbitration award of over £16 million plus interest and costs (“the Award”) made in 2016 by an International Chamber of Commerce arbitral tribunal against the appellant, the State of Libya (“Libya”). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm by Jason Mazzone
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
They did so on 3 grounds, one of which was that the United States was the only country in the world that executed juveniles. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Today the Independence Institute filed my amicus curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court, in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 7:28 am
United States, decided on Jan. 4, 1879, was one of the first cases to consider what... [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:38 pm by Ruthann Robson
Williams, United States District Judge Christine Arguello enjoined Colorado Revised Statute § 1-13-712(1), which prohibits a voter from “show[ing] his ballot after... [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law United States District Judge Myron Thompson, in a lengthy opinion in Planned Parenthood Southeast v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]