Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE" Results 3321 - 3340 of 40,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 7:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that these restrictions do not violate the Second Amendment.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:55 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tibble v Edison, now up before the Supreme Court, and the history of excessive fee class action litigation presents a nice way of looking at this phenomenon. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Although the Second Circuit recognized that the company is large, it is not so large that Catsimatidis is unable to influence day-to-day management decisions. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm by HS_admin
    These statements are based largely on a report completed by an independent research group which blames large scale litigation as the primary reason the construction of condominiums has diminished in the state over the last few years. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 3:07 pm by Ilya Somin
In 2005, the Supreme Court generated widespread outrage when it ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
v=Vu0j176y5FEVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
The authors also provide a rich analysis of the legal challenges to martial law that culminated in Duncan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
v=dqsJbfWGXGEVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Source: Stas_V / iStock / Getty Images The legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 5 late September 10, a bill that largely codifies the 2018 Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:09 am by Ray Mullman
  DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar released a report confirming that large scale contributions to judicial campaigns have reached unprecedented levels in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]