Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 45,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
Is arguing that a trade mark in revocation proceedings has become non-distinctive consistent with this line of case law? [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The other vulnerability is exemplified by the Vermeule thing: his argument seems to be that left constitutionalism and his "common good constitutionalism" are basically following along the same Dworkinian lines, except that the left has the wrong principles, rooted in the wrong value system. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
For example, last summer, the California Supreme Court ruled in an employment lawsuit of Grande v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
The judge considered the purpose and effect of s.23 by reference to the case of R(on the application of Idolo) v Bromley LBC (2020) EWHC 860 (Admin), (2021) HLR 17, our note here. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:03 am
In Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v Adams, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled that a non-compete contained in the parties’ sale of business agreement was overbroad. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
That tradition held, broadly, that the Constitution requires that government ensure wealth and political power are widely distributed among the people, rather than being concentrated in too few hands; that we build and protect a broad, open middle class; and that our political economy must be inclusive across lines such as race. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:49 am
When it struck down Obama’s signature climate regulation in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 4:32 am
The request was denied in a one-line order and some were alarmed by the fact there was not a single dissenting vote or statement from the justices. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Corso Ventures LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Or more precisely, this argument echoes the position raised in Walter Nixon v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:18 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:45 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Bull and McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Bulland McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
R.B., Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:49 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —A joint eSTAR pilot (which we previewed in November) between FDA and Health Canada has now been launched. [read post]
