Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 13,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
BC Provincial Court eNews Little Legal SummariesFeb 3 R v Huerta, 2020 ONCA 59. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
The other two, CREW v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm
When Brompton cycles became available for hire at my local railway station, but apparently with the intent that people would hire them to take to London rather than on arriving from London or elsewhere, I had one of those moments of clarity that comes to me when I realise I no longer understand how the world works (another instance of which is when I was reading Frank Zappa's obituary in the Financial Times).A friend I made in the course of commuting - one of many, including a… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm
Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
There is no downside in asking.We should expect this line of questioning to be met with resistance from the trial court, which has broad discretion in limiting questioning during jury selection (see People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135[1971]; People v Corbett, 68 AD2d 7762 [4th Dept 1979]). [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
Kerner v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
Turner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
Most people aren’t, even if they have heard of it. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court agreed in Timbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Instead, both Cass Sunstein and Larry Tribe offer their tut-tuts at the very prospect of impeaching Tyler and generally adopt what has become the party line that impeachment is a true last resort to be used only in exceptional situations. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
The bottom line though was that the government won. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
Three months ago, this Kat discussed the Feilin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
The bylaws state that “in the future” people will be able to appeal to the board in matters relating to a broad range of content types, including groups, pages and—perhaps most significantly, given the constant ongoing controversy—advertisements. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
Unsuccessful pursuit of that line of argument went beyond that which the Defendants needed to prove to satisfy for their truth defence and ostensibly cost them in aggravated damages, which were subsumed into the £75,000 award. [read post]
