Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
In the case of each of L, P and R, all this occurred within the 7-day permitted period. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:02 am
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) provides that “Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense—including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:02 am
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) provides that “Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense—including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
” -Jeff B. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Jack B. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
P. 52.8(a). [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
Supp. 2d at 496, there is little to suggest that § 4(b)’s coverage formula continues to capture jurisdictions with especially high levels of voter discrimination. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:41 am
” p. 35. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:00 am
b?? [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Miller’s statement always seemed to be a preposterous one to me, and I wrote about it at the time, saying that I found it impossible to accept that there were “hundreds if not thousands” of lawyers scamming homeowners in California or anywhere else for that matter. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Miller’s statement always seemed to be a preposterous one to me, and I wrote about it at the time, saying that I found it impossible to accept that there were “hundreds if not thousands” of lawyers scamming homeowners in California or anywhere else for that matter. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
Soven and Timothy P. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The fact that in claim 2 now only one herbicide (B) is required only corresponds to the abandonment of part of the claimed subject-matter and does not generate a new subgroup that has not been originally disclosed (see T 615/95 [6]). [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Call Corey P. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:26 pm
But then perhaps I’m just dense, because I can’t even work out how one can simultaneously adopt the position that option A is the “gold standard” alongside the assertion that options B – Z are not somehow second best. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
P. 9(b). [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:57 am
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Brian P. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:57 am
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Brian P. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Research & resources Eugene Volokh, ‘First Amendment Protection for Search Engine Results‘ – a white paper for Google [PDF] [Wired report], April 2012 Jeffrey P. [read post]
13 May 2012, 7:00 pm
And the alliteration… of course “P’s” are funny? [read post]
