Search for: "Mark May" Results 3321 - 3340 of 64,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:26 am by Silver Law Group
According to FINRA Disciplinary actions for May 2023, the following individuals were barred from FINRA and cannot currently work for a FINRA brokerage firm for failing to provide FINRA with information it requested or to keep information current with FINRA pursuant to FINRA rules: NAME FORMER EMPLOYERS   Albert Foronda   Spartan Capital Securities, LLC   Worden Capital Management LLC   Mark Miranda   Spartan Capital Securities, LLC   Network 1… [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:00 am by Tom Mighell
Welcome to your Friday Tech Fix for May 8, 2020! [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:06 am by Tom Mighell
Welcome to your Friday Tech Fix for the first day of May, 2020. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:26 am by Unknown
       FinTech Forum concludesSEC Press Release--- If you believe need help with a securities litigation, arbitration or litigation issue, email Mark Astarita or call 212-509-6544 to speak to a securities lawyer. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:47 am by Mitchell Stabbe
  MLB has legitimate concerns about unauthorized uses of its trademarks where consumers may be confused into believing that the advertiser is approved by or connected with Major League Baseball because such use may threaten an exclusive license for use of the mark in a particular geographic market, e.g., “The Official Beer of [insert name of your team]. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:03 am
"[A] mark becomes abandoned only when the mark loses all significance as an indication of origin in the mark holder, not merely because it  may longer be viewed as indicating only the mark holder as a single source. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 3:13 am
Moreover, the application and cited registration encompass low-priced goods that may be purchased on impulse. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:30 am by John L. Welch
The hearing schedule and other details regarding attendance may be found at the TTAB website (lower right-hand corner)]. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:21 am
Hage-Boutros may have presented an unpersuasive argument, but his appeal was not clearly frivolous under the auspices of Rule 38. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
From this evidence, Bertini "essentially requests that the Board infer that Respondent was not using the APPLE mark in connection with the recited services from November 11, 2011 to May 31, 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:20 am
The Board, however, observed once again that under these circumstances, where the marks are nearly identical, even sophisticated purchasers may be confused.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:51 am
" The Office deemed the mark confusingly similar to the registered mark LINGO for telecommunication services. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 4:23 am
In re P&P Imports LLC, Serial No. 88915014 (May 26, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 3:46 am
’” *** The “‘fact that Applicant may be the first or only user of a term does not render that term distinctive, if it otherwise meets the standard’ for descriptiveness. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:33 am
Even without evidence of actual use, "third-party registrations may be relevant to show that a mark or a portion of a mark is descriptive, suggestive, or so commonly used in a particular industry that the public will look to other elements to distinguish the source of the goods and services. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:02 am
[The complaints are usually attached to the Notice of Appeal filed at the TTAB; other court papers may, of course, be found via PACER]. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:41 am
However, as long as the Board considers the mark as a whole, it may give more or less weight to a part of the mark. [read post]