Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3321 - 3340
of 21,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2021, 8:40 am
That case, Terry v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
At present, current unemployment law prohibits consideration of licensing requirements or other state or federal law in determining employee status. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 6:44 am
The opinion is styled, Mark Calkin v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 6:18 am
" Royal Crown Cola Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:25 pm
State Police, 227 N.J. 482, 500 (2017), and Caraballo v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:04 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
" Snyder's Lance, Inc. and Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
ShareOn Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
