Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 3321 - 3340 of 7,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA… [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 17 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick P, Black and Lewison LJJ) gave judgment in the case of JX MX (A child proceeding by her Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs AXMX) v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
All Saints (Long Beach) et al., Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles and ECUSA v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:03 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  The Supreme Court recognized these limits in Bas v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Long term observers of the newspapers were unable to recall any previous editorial complaining about administrative judicial allocation decisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
  But as drug and device products liability lawyers in New Jersey, we bear another burden -- Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:37 pm
It is a monster – 400 pages long – and you can read it here. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
(Ley de Ética en el Ejercicio de Función Pública, law 25.188, chapter 10, article 42. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
When an advertiser represents that claims have been scientifically established, the FTC has long held the advertiser to the level of evidence required to convince the relevant scientific community of the claim’s truthfulness. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Case by case v. systematic: the cost of false positives and false negatives; court doesn’t consider the long-run consequences, like Boston Hockey or post-sale confusion. [read post]